LB vs. Wyomissing Area School District

PENNSYLVANIA
SPECIAL EDUCATION HEARING OFFICER

6205/05-06 LS

File Number

L.B.

Child’s Name

Xx/xx/xx

Date of Birth

March 13, 14 and 23, 2006

Dates of Hearing

Closed

Type of Hearing

For the Student: Parent(s)

Vivian Narehood, Esq. Gibbel, Kraybill & Hess 41 East Orange Street Lancaster, PA 17602

For the Wyomissing Area School District:

Karen Zerr
Director of Special Education Wyomissing Area School District 630 Evans Avenue
Wyomissing, PA 19610-2636

Andrew E. Faust, Esq.
Sweet, Stevens, Tucker & Katz 331 Butler Avenue
P.O. Box 5069
New Britain, PA 18901-5069

Dates of Hearing: March 13, 14 and 23, 2006

Receipt of Written Closing Statements: April 17, 2006

Date Record Closed: April 17, 2006

Date of Decision: May 2, 2006

Hearing Officer: Daniel J. Myers

BACKGROUND

Student (Student) is a [preteenaged] child with autism residing in the Wyomissing Area School District (School District.) His parents reject the School District’s most recently proposed December 2005 individualized education program (IEP), and they contend that the School District has inappropriately implemented Student’s IEPs for the last two school years.

ISSUES

Whether or not the School District’s most recently proposed December 2005 IEP is appropriate?

Whether or not the School District has denied a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) to Student IEPs since September, 2004?

L-B-Wyomissing-Area-ODRNo-6205-05-06-LS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.