SB vs. AMBRIDGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

HEARING OFFICER DECISION/ORDER

CHILD’S NAME: S.B.

AMBRIDGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT (FILE # 6309/05-06 KE)

DateofBirth: [redacted]

Date of Hearing: March 24, 2006

I. PARTIES TO THE HEARING

PARENT:

PARENT REPRESENTATIVE:

DISTRICT CONTACT:
Ms. Michelle Scala-Dubaich Supervisor of Special Education 740 Park Road
Ambridge, PA 15003-2474

DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE: Gregory Gleason, Esquire
Jocelyn M. Perry, Esquire
503 Ft. Pitt Commons Building 445 Ft. Pitt Blvd.

Pittsburgh PA 15219

DATE TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED: March 27, 2006

HEARING OFFICER: Dorothy J. O’Shea, Ph.D.

___________________________

Signature: Hearing Officer

March 29, 2006
Date of Decision/Order

HEARING OFFICER DECISION/ORDER
CHILD’S NAME: Student
AMBRIDGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT (FILE # 6309/05-06 KE)

II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Student and his father, Parent, are not residents of the Ambridge Area School District (i.e., the District). Student’s father made a February 8, 2006 due process hearing request to the Office for Dispute Resolution (ODR) concerning Student’s educational program in the District. On February 28, 2006, the District challenged the sufficiency of the father’s February 8, 2006 due process hearing request, asking for information on Student’s residency and specificity regarding the father’s request for due process.

IV. ISSUE

Should the District’s March 24, 2006 Motion to Dismiss be granted?

S-B-AMBRIDGE-AREA-SCHOOL-DISTRICT-ODRNo-6309-05-06KE

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.