Student vs. Parkland School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: [REDACTED]

Date of Birth: [REDACTED]

Dates of Hearing: July 16, July 18, July 25, August 13, August 18, 1008

OPEN HEARING

ODR No. 8729/07-08 LS

Parties to the Hearing:

Donna Kapes
5032 Mohawk Drive Schnecksville, PA 18078

Joseph Kapes
146 Briar Lane Weatherly, PA 18255

Robert Thornburg
Director of Student Services Parkland School District 1210 Springhouse Road Allentown, PA 18104-2119

Representative: Pro Se

Pro Se

Joanne D. Sommer, Esq. Eastburn and Gray, P.C. 60 East Court Street Doylestown, PA 18901

Date Record Closed: August 23, 2008

Date of Decision: September 6, 2008

Hearing Officer: Daniel J. Myers

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[REDACTED] (Student)1 is a teenage, high-functioning autistic student who has met the School District’s graduation requirements. Student contends that s/he was denied a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) over the last two school years and Student contests the proposed educational program and placement offered by the School District for the upcoming school year. For the reasons described below, I find for the Student.

ISSUES

  • Whether the School District provided FAPE to Student for the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 school years?
  • Whether the School District’s proposed 2008-2008 program and placement is appropriate?
Student-Parkland-ODRNo-8729-07-08-LS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.