BL vs. North Penn School District

This is a redacted version of the original decision. Select details have been removed from the decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the substance of the document.

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: BL
Date of Birth:

Dates of Hearing: July 13 and July 28,

CLOSED HEARING

ODR Case # 10040-08-09-KE

Parties to the Hearing:

Mr. Jenna Rufo
North Penn School District 401 E. Hancock Street Lansdale, PA 19446

Representative:

Pro Se

Thomas Warner, Esquire
Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams 331 Butler Avenue
P.O. Box 5069
New Britain, PA 18901

Date Record Closed: August 17, 2009

Date of Decision: September 1, 2009

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire

 

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Student (“student”) is a 19-year old student residing in the North Penn School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. The parents requested an independent occupational therapy/sensory integration (“OT/SI”) evaluation at District expense. The District requested a due process hearing to defend the appropriateness of its occupational therapy evaluation.

ISSUE

Is the District’s OT/SI evaluation appropriate, or are the parents entitled to an independent evaluation at District expense?
Are the parents entitled to reimbursement of fees for services provided by a neuro-developmental disability case manager?

BL-North-Penn-ODRNo-10040-08-09-KE

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.