BS vs. Beaver Area School District

This is a redacted version of the original decision. Select details have been removed from the decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the substance of the document.

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: B.S.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing: August 22, 2012 September 24, 2012


ODR Case # 3440-1213AS

Parties to the Hearing:


Beaver Area School District 855 Second Street
Beaver, PA 15009


Pro Se

Christina Lane, Esquire 1500 Ardmore Boulevard Suite 506
Pittsburgh, PA 15221

Date Record Closed: September 24, 2012

Date of Decision: October 16, 2012

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire



[Student] (hereinafter “student”) is [a late teen-aged] student who resides in the Beaver Area School District (“District”) and who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”) and Pennsylvania special education regulations (“Chapter 14”).1 The student has been identified as a student with visual impairment; specifically, the student has low vision due to a genetic trait. Parents allege that the student was denied a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) as the result of allegedly inappropriate extended school year (“ESY”) programming in the summer of 2012.2

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the District.



Did the District meet its obligation to provide FAPE
to the student through ESY programming in the summer of 2012?



Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.