This is a redacted version of the original decision. Select details have been removed from the
decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the substance of
the document.

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: C.D.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Date of Hearing: July 8, 2010


ODR Case # 17881-1516KE

Parties to the Hearing:


Quakertown Community School District 100 Commerce Drive
Quakertown, PA 18951


Frederick Stanczak, Esq.
179 North Broad Street – 2nd Floor Doylestown, PA 18901

Mark Walz, Esq.
331 East Butler Avenue New Britain, PA 18601

Date Record Closed: July 8, 2016

Date of Decision: July 13, 2016

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire



[The Student] (“student”)1 is a [late teenaged] student who resides in the Quakertown Community School District (“District”). The student is eligible as a student with a disability Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)2, namely as a student with multiple health impairments and a speech/language impairment. The parties’ dispute centers on the student’s extended school year (“ESY”) program for the summer of 2016. The parents maintain that the District’s proposed ESY program is inappropriate and request alternative ESY arrangements. The District maintains that the proposed ESY program it has offered is appropriate and, as such, has complied with its duties under federal and Pennsylvania law to offer the student a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”).

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the District.



Is the District’s proposed ESY program appropriate? If not, is the student entitled to remedy?



Leave a Reply