CE vs. Pennsbury School District

This is a redacted version of the original decision. Select details have been removed from the decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the substance of the document.

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: C.E.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing:
August 24, 2011
August 25, 2011
August 26, 2011

CLOSED HEARING

ODR Case # 1835-10-11-AS

Parties to the Hearing:

Parent[s]

Pennsbury School District 134 Yardley Avenue Fallsington, PA 19052

Representative:

David G.C. Arnold, Esq.
920 Matsonford Road
Suite 106
West Conshohocken, PA 19428

Claudia Huot, Esq.
Wisler Pearlstine
Blue Bell Executive Campus 460 Norristown Road
Suite 110
Blue Bell, PA 19422-2323

Date Record Closed: September 12, 2011

Date of Decision: September 27, 2011

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire

 

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Student is [an elementary school-age] student residing in the Pennsbury School District (“District”) who is a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEA”)1. Specifically, the student is identified with specific learning disabilities and a speech/language impairment. The parents have requested compensatory education and tuition reimbursement of a privately funded education placement due to an alleged failure by the District to provide a free appropriate public education (”FAPE”). Particularly, parents claim compensatory education from May 18, 2009 through the commencement of the 2009-2010 school year and tuition reimbursement for the 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years.2 The District maintains that, when the student attended the District, it provided the student with FAPE and that the last-offered programming was reasonably calculated to yield meaningful education benefit and, as such, was designed to provide FAPE to the student.

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the parents although the award will be in an amount less than 100%.

 

ISSUES

Was the student denied a FAPE from May 19, 2009 through the commencement of the 2009- 2010 school year?

If so, is compensatory education owed as a result?

Was the last-offered educational program proposed by the District in June 2009 appropriate?

If not, are parents entitled to tuition reimbursement for the unilateral private placement undertaken for the 2009-2010, 2010- 2011, and 2011-2012 school years?

 

C-E-Pennsbury-ODRNo-1835-10-11-AS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.