CG vs. Greater Johnstown School District

This is a redacted version of the original decision. Select details have been removed from the decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the substance of the document.

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: C.G.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Date of Hearing: May 9, 2012


ODR Case # 2923-1112AS

Parties to the Hearing:


Greater Johnstown School District 1091 Broad Street
Johnstown, PA 15906-2437


Pro Se

John J. Kuzmiak, Esquire 442 Main Street Johnstown, PA 15901

Date Record Closed: May 9, 2012

Date of Decision: May 29, 2012

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire



Student is an [elementary school-aged] student residing in the Greater Johnstown School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”) and Pennsylvania special education regulations (“Chapter 14”).1 Specifically, the student has been identified as a student with specific learning disabilities in reading and mathematics and a health impairment, namely attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”).

Parents assert that the student’s educational placement was unilaterally changed by the District after parent initiated a previous round of special education due process in November 2011, in violation of the “stay-put” provisions of the IDEIA and Chapter 14.2

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of parents.



Did the District violate the student’s stay-put protections, triggered by the parents filing of a complaint
in November 2011?



Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.