DC vs. Reading School District



Child’s Name: D.C.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing:


ODR File No. 14350/1314AS

Parties to the Hearing: Parents

Reading School District 800 Washington Street Reading, PA 19601-3616

Representative: Pro Se

Kathleen M. Metcalfe, Esquire
Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams LLC 331 E. Butler Avenue
New Britain, PA 18901

Date Record Closed: November 8, 2013

Date of Decision: November 18, 2013

Hearing Officer: Cathy A. Skidmore, M.Ed., J.D.



Student1 is a late-teenaged student in the Reading School District (District) who is eligible for special education pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)2 by reason of Intellectual Disability and Speech/Language Impairment. Following a parental request for an Independent Educational Evaluation at public expense, the District filed a due process complaint on October 4, 2013, seeking an order denying the Parent’s request.3

The case proceeded to a due process hearing convening over three sessions, at which the parties presented evidence in support of their respective positions. The District sought to establish that its Reevaluation Report was appropriate under the applicable law, while the Parents challenged that position.

For the reasons set forth below, and following careful review of the Reevaluation Report at issue, as well as consideration of the testimony and exhibits, I find in favor of the District.


  1. Whether the District’s Reevaluation Report of September 9, 2013, was appropriate; and
  2. If it was not appropriate, are the Parents and Student entitled to an Independent Educational Evaluation at public expense?

Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.