EG vs. Springfield Township School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Student’s Name: E.G.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

ODR No.17867-1516AS


Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Springfield Township School District
1901 Paper Mill Road Orland, PA 19075


Pro se

Michele Mintz, Esq.
Fox Rothschild, LLP
10 Sentry Parkway, Ste. 200 PO Box 3001
Blue Bell, PA 19422

Dates of Hearing: N/A

Record Closed: July 18, 2016

Date of Decision: July 18, 2016

Hearing Officer: Brian Jason Ford, JD, CHO


This special education due process hearing concerns the educational rights of a [beyond teenaged] student (Former Student) who graduated from the Springfield Township School District (District) in June of 2014. The Student’s father (Father) requested this due process hearing against the District, alleging violations of the Student’s special education rights.

The Complaint raises claims concerning the Former Student and another of the Father’s children. Claims arise under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. and its federal and state implementing regulations. The matter was bifurcated, and claims concerning the other child are captioned under a separate ODR file number.

The District filed a motion to dismiss (MTD), raising two bases for dismissal. First, the District argues that the claims raised in Complaint are barred, at least in part, by a prior settlement agreement. Second, the District argues that the Complaint is untimely.

For the reasons stated below, I grant the District’s MTD and dismiss this matter.


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.