EM vs. Pittsburgh Public Schools

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: EM
Date of Birth: XX-XX-XXXX

Dates of Hearing:
November 3, 2009 & January 25, 2010


ODR Case # 00261-09-10-LS

Parties to the Hearing: Mr. .

Dr. Lillian Wright Pittsburgh Public Schools 341 S. Bellefield Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Representative: Pro Se

Aimee Rankin, Esq. Law Offices of Ira Weiss 445 Fort Pitt Boulevard Suite 503
Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Date Record Closed: January 25, 2010

Date of Decision: February 9, 2010

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


“Student” (“student”) is a 18-year old student residing in the Pittsburgh School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. Namely, the student has been identified as having an emotional disturbance, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”), and a speech and language impairment. The parent has alleged that the District has mis-served the student in various capacities over many years and that the District has committed procedural and substantive violations of IDEIA. The District maintains that it has acted appropriately at all times towards the student in the design and implementation of the student’s special education programming.


Has the District failed to provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the student through procedural acts and/or omissions?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.