HB vs. Chartiers Valley School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: H.B.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing:

June 8, 2011 June 17, 2011 July 8, 2011 July 20, 2011


ODR Case # 1824-10-11-KE

Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Chartiers Valley School District 2030 Swallow Hill Road Pittsburgh, PA 15220

Representative: Pro Se

R. Russell Lucas, Esq. 3301 McCrady Road Pittsburgh, PA 15235

Date Record Closed: July 20, 2011

Date of Decision: August 1, 2011

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student is [a preteenage] student residing in the Chartiers Valley School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (specifically under Section 504 of that statute, hence the follow-on reference to this section as “Section 504”).1 The parties agree that the student qualifies for services under Section 504. The parties disagree over the appropriateness of the implementation of the student’s Section 504 plan in the 2010-2011 school year.

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the District.


Was the student denied a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) from the alleged inappropriate implementation of the Section 504 plan in the 2010-2011 school year?

Did the District discriminate against the student based on disability from the alleged inappropriate implementation of the Section 504 plan in the 2010-2011 school year?

If the answer to either question is in the affirmative, what remedy is available to the student?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.