JH vs. Altoona Area School District

Special Education Hearing Officer

Child’s Name: J.H.
Date of Birth: [redacted]

Date of Hearing: July 31, 2009


ODR No. 10022/08-09 KE

Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Altoona Area School District 1221 6th Avenue
Altoona, PA 16602-2427

Representative: Pro Se

Carl Beard, Esquire Andrews & Beard
3366 Lynnwood Drive Altoona, PA 16603-1311

Date Record Closed: August 8, 2009

Date of Decision: August 20, 2009

Hearing Officer: Daniel J. Myers


Student is [a pre-teenaged] student with autism residing in the Altoona Area School District (District) whose Parent disagrees with the District’s March 4, 2009 proposed individualized education plan (IEP) and educational placement for Student. The District proposes to increase the restrictiveness of Student’s placement by providing regular education language arts instruction in a one-to-one setting rather than in the regular education language arts classroom. Student’s Parent does not agree with this proposal but has not stated why she disagrees. Based upon past history, however, it appears that Parent believes that Student requires full inclusion in all regular education settings.

The record establishes that Student requires the academic rigor of the regular education language arts curriculum, but in a more restrictive environment with fewer opportunities for Student to engage in inappropriate, counter-productive attention seeking, task avoidance and peer disruption behaviors. Accordingly, the District’s proposed IEP and educational placement are appropriate and shall be implemented.


Is the District’s March 4, 2009 proposed program and placement appropriate?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.