KC vs. Belle Vernon Area School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: K.C.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing: October 21, 2013 November 7, 2013 November 12, 2013

CLOSED HEARING

ODR Case # 14230-1314KE

Parties to the Hearing: Parents

Belle Vernon Area School District 270 Crest Avenue
Belle Vernon, PA 153012

Representative:

Pamela Berger, Esquire 434 Grace Street Pittsburgh, PA 15211

Aimee Zundel, Esquire 445 Fort Pitt Boulevard Suite 503
Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Date Record Closed: November 12, 2013

Date of Decision: November 22, 2013

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Student is a pre-teen age student residing in the Belle Vernon Area School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEA”)1. The student, diagnosed with Down Syndrome, has been identified under the terms of IDEA as a student with an intellectual disability, and a speech/language impairment. Parent claims the program and placement proposed for the student by the District for the 2013-2014 school year is not reasonably calculated to provide the student with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) in the least restrictive requirement (“LRE”), as required under IDEA and Pennsylvania special education regulations.

More specifically, the parents claim that, with the closure of the out-of-District life skills classroom where the student’s individualized education plan (“IEP”) was being implemented, the District’s proposed placement at a newly-created life skills classroom within the District is not the LRE. Parents claim the District, with the student’s transition back to the District, should employ supplementary aids and services to allow the student to attend the student’s neighborhood school within the District.

The District does not discount the importance of LRE considerations in the student’s educational program but asserts that the newly-created life skills classroom is the more appropriate placement. Therefore, the District argues, the appropriateness of its proposed placement in the life skills classroom outweighs LRE considerations involving attendance at the student’s neighborhood school.2

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the parents and student.

ISSUES

Is the least restrictive environment
for the student’s education program
the student’s neighborhood school, or the District’s life skills classroom?

K-C-Belle-Vernon-Area-ODRNo-14230-1314KE

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.