KG vs. Pennsbury School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION
ODR No. 00603-0910AS

Child’s Name: KG
Date of Birth: x/xx/xxxx

Date of Hearing: 4/14/10

CLOSED HEARING

Parties to the Hearing: Parents

School District
Pennsbury School District
134 Yardley Avenue, P.O.Box 338 Fallsington, PA 19058-0338

Representative:

Parent Attorney
Stephen J. Jacobson, Esquire Connolly, Jacobson & John 188 North Main Street Doylestown, PA 18901

School District Attorney Claudia Huot, Esq.
Wisler, Pearlstine, LLP
484 Norristown Road, Suit 100 Blue Bell, PA 19422

Date Record Closed: April 23, 2010

Date of Decision: May 8, 2010

Hearing Officer: Anne L. Carroll, Esq.

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

(Student) is a ten year old resident of the Pennsbury School District (hereinafter District). Before beginning kindergarten in the District, Student had been identified as IDEA eligible by reason of an autism spectrum disorder that primarily affects language and social skills.

The dispute in this matter is centered on the legal interpretation of a settlement agreement whereby the District paid Student’s tuition at a private school chosen by Parents for several years. Early in the 2009/2010 school year, Student was disenrolled from the private school by mutual agreement of the private school and Parents due to the school’s inability to continue meeting Student’s needs. Parents immediately sought educational services from the District, but was admittedly not offered a special education program/and placement for four months, until after the District completed a reevaluation of Student.

Parents initiated a due process complaint for compensatory education, contending that the District was required to provide a FAPE to Student upon notice that she was no longer enrolled in the private school and Parents’ simultaneous request for services. The District maintains that the parties’ agreement relieved it of the obligation to provide a FAPE to Student for the entire 2009/2010 school year.

With few facts in dispute, the hearing was completed in one fairly brief session, followed by submission of a written closing argument from the District as agreed by the parties. Parents elected to rely upon their opening statement, as well as the testimony and documents of record. Based upon the largely undisputed facts, the plain language of the agreement at issue and the provisions of the IDEA statute, Parents will be awarded compensatory education from October 13, 2009 until February 16, 2010, the day before Student began attending her current program.

ISSUE

Was the District required to provide Student with an appropriate special education program for the portion of the 2009/2010 school year that she was not attending the private school program for which the School District had paid tuition in lieu of FAPE pursuant to an agreement between the parties?

KG-Pennsbury-ODRNo-00603-0910AS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.