KN vs. Tunkhannock School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: K.N.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

ODR No. 3128-11-12-KE


Parties to the Hearing: Parent

Tunkhannock School District 41 Philadelphia Avenue

Tunkhannock, PA 18657

Parties to the Hearing: Parent

Tunkhannock School District 41 Philadelphia Avenue

Tunkhannock, PA 18657

Heather Hulse, Esquire McAndrews Law Offices 30 Cassatt Avenue Berwyn, PA 19312

William McPartland, Esquire
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin
50 Glemaura National Boulevard Moosic, PA 18507

Date of Hearing: May 31, 2012

Record Closed: June 11, 2012

Date of Decision: June 12, 2012

Hearing Officer: Linda M. Valentini, Psy.D., CHO


Student is a high school aged student residing in the District and enrolled in a District school. The Parent asked for this hearing to challenge the District’s conclusion that certain behaviors in question were not a manifestation of Student’s disability.

The hearing was conducted in one session on an expedited basis. I conclude that the District’s procedure in conducting the manifestation determination was inappropriate, although I find that the District’s conclusion that the behavior was not a manifestation of Student’s disability was correct.


Were the District’s manifestation determination procedures appropriate?

Were Student’s behaviors a manifestation of Student’s disability?

If the District incorrectly determined that Student’s behaviors were not a manifestation of Student’s disability, should the District provide Student with compensatory education for days of suspension and take any action with regard to the police and the courts?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.