KP vs. Eastern Lebanon County School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: KP

Date of Birth:
Date of Hearing: August 24, 2009


ODR Case # 9979-08-09-AS

Parties to the Hearing:

Ms. Amy Shoemaker
Director of Pupil Services
Eastern Lebanon County School District 180 Elco Drive
Myerstown, PA 17067


Amy C. Slody, Esq. Gibbel, Kraybill & Hess 41 East Orange Street Lancaster, PA 17602

Anthony F. Andrisano, Jr. Marshall, Dennehy, et. al. 4200 Crums Mill Road/Suite B Harrisburg, PA 17112

Date Record Closed: September 10, 2009

Date of Decision: September 25, 2009

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student is a 17-year old student residing in the Eastern Lebanon County School District (“District”) who parents claim should have been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. The parents have requested compensatory education and tuition reimbursement of a privately funded education placement due to an alleged failure to provide a free appropriate public education (”FAPE”). Specifically, parents allege that the District should have identified the student as a student with an emotional disturbance and specific learning disabilities. The District maintains that the student does not meet the criteria for any identification as a student with a disability under the IDEIA and, consequently, has acted appropriately at all times towards the student.


Does the student qualify under the IDEIA as a student with an emotional disturbance?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.