KS vs. North Pocono School District


6477/05-06 KE

File Number


Child’s Name


Date of Birth

August 29, 2006

Date of Hearing


Type of Hearing

For the Student: Parents

Drew Christian, Esq. Attorney-at-Law 801 Monroe Avenue Scranton, PA 18510

For the North Pocono School District:

Carole Natitus
Supervisor of Pupil Personnel North Pocono School District 851 Church Street
Moscow, PA 18444

Anne E. Hendricks, Esq.
Levin Legal Group
1301 Masons Mill Business Park 1800 Byberry Road
Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

Date of Hearing: August 29, 2006

Date of Receipt of Transcript: September 5, 2006

Date of Decision: September 20, 2006

Hearing Officer: Daniel J. Myers


Student is a xx year old, 11th grade resident of the School District whose alleged anxiety, depression and/or school-related panic attacks prompted his psychiatrist to recommend four months of homebound instruction. After placing Student on homebound instruction, the School District then pressed truancy charges. Eventually, the School District issued an evaluation report concluding that Student does not have a disability and is not in need of either specially designed instruction or accommodations. Student contests the School District’s evaluation report and seeks an independent educational evaluation. For the reasons described below, I conclude that the School District’s evaluation report is not sufficiently thorough and, therefore, is not appropriate. Accordingly, I will order that the School District provide Student with an independent educational evaluation at public expense.


Whether Student is entitled to an independent educational evaluation?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.