MH vs. Methacton School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: M. H.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing: August 7, 2014 September 26, 2014 September 29, 2014 October 3, 2014


ODR Case # 15199-1415AS

Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Methacton School District 1001 Kriebel Mill Road Norristown, PA 19403


Mark Voigt, Esquire
Plymouth Meeting Executive Campus 600 West Germantown Pike
Suite 400
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

Christina Stephanos, Esquire Sweet Stevens
331 Butler Avenue
New Britain, PA 18601

Date Record Closed: November 10, 2014

Date of Decision: November 25, 2014

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student is a [teen age] student residing in the Methacton School District (“District”). The parties do not dispute whether the student qualifies as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEA”)1. Parent claims that the District owes the parent tuition reimbursement for a unilateral private placement undertaken for the 2014-2015 school year because the District’s proposed program and placement was not designed to provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the student.

The District counters that its program and placement proposed for the 2014-2015 school year are reasonably calculated to provide FAPE to the student and, as such, parent is not entitled to tuition reimbursement or compensatory education for alleged violations of IDEA.

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the parent.


Is the parent entitled to tuition reimbursement for the unilateral private placement undertaken for the 2014-2015 school year?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.