MS vs. Woodland Hills School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: MS

Date of Birth: XX-XX-XXXX

Dates of Hearing:
September 4, October 28, November 11, November 13, & December 2, 2009 January 8, 2010


ODR Case # 00014-09-10-LS

Parties to the Hearing:

Mr. David Johnston
Woodland Hills School District 2430 Greensburg Pike Pittsburgh, PA 15221


Arthur Feldman, Esq. 1010 LaClair Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15218

Barbara Graham, Esq. Rachel Lozosky, Esq. 70 East Beau Street Washington, PA 15301

Date Record Closed: February 8, 2010

Date of Decision: February 23, 2010

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


“Student” (“student”) is a 6-year old student residing in the Woodland Hills School District (“District”) who has been identified as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1, specifically as a child on the autism spectrum. Parents filed a complaint in July 2009, alleging that the individualized education plan (“IEP”) proposed for the student failed to provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the student for the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years. Parents requested compensatory education for those school years in addition to a hearing officer order for a private placement at a specific private school. For the reasons set forth below, the District will prevail on all of parents’ claims.


Are the student’s IEPs proposed for the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 school years reasonably calculated to provide a FAPE to the student?

If not, is compensatory education owed to the parents?

If not, is the student entitled to a due process order for a private placement at a specific private school?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.