NG vs. Wallingford-Swarthmore School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: N.G.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Date of Hearing: June 3, 2010


ODR Case # 00986-0910KE

Parties to the Hearing: Mother


Dr. Ron VanLangeveld Wallingford-Swarthmore School District 101 Plush Mill Road
Wallingford, PA 19086


Mark Voigt, Esquire
Plymouth Meeting Executive Campus 600 W. Germantown Pike
Suite 400
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

Pro Se

Timothy Gilsbach, Esq. 10 Sentry Parkway Suite 200
P.O. Box 3001

Blue Bell, PA 19422

Date Record Closed: June 23, 2010

Date of Decision: July 8, 2010

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student is an early teen-aged student residing in the Wallingford- Swarthmore School District (“District”). The parties dispute whether the student is a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. The District’s evaluation found that the student was not eligible under IDEIA. The student’s mother filed a complaint requesting, among other things, an independent education evaluation (“IEE”) at public expense. The student’s father participated in the proceedings in his own interest, supporting the claims brought by mother. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, the student’s mother withdrew all claims except the claim for an IEE. The District defended the appropriateness of its evaluation and denied that the student is entitled to an IEE at public expense. For the reasons set forth below, the student’s parents will prevail, and the District will be ordered to provide an IEE at public expense.


Must the District fund an IEE?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.