PM vs. Muncy School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER

Student’s Name: P.M.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

ODR No. 14400-1314AS

CLOSED HEARING

Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Muncy School District 125 New Street Muncy, PA 17756

Representative:

Phillip A. Drumheiser, Esq. P.O. Box 890
Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013

Jeffrey F. Champagne, Esq. 100 Pine Street
PO Box 1166
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166

Dates of Hearing: 02/21/2014, 03/21/2014, 04/17/2014, 04/25/2014 05/05/2014, 06/04/2014

Record Closed: 06/30/2014

Date of Decision: 07/14/2014

Hearing Officer: Brian Jason Ford

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This matter arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), 34 C.F.R. Part 104.4., as effectuated by 22 Pa. Code § 15 et seq. (Chapter 15).

The Parents’ original complaint was filed on October 18, 2013. That matter was conditionally dismissed on November 6, 2013. The matter was then reinstated on January 14, 2014. Next, the matter was bifurcated to address an issue concerning the IDEA’s statute of limitations (the Parents claimed exceptions to the statute of limitations). A hearing to take evidence concerning the limitations issue convened on February 21, 2014. On March 7, 2014, I issued a Preliminary Decision wherein I found that the IDEA’s two-year statute of limitations applies to this case. Five additional hearing sessions then convened regarding the issues identified below.

ISSUES

  1. Is the Student IDEA-eligible (meaning, is the Student a “child with a disability” as defined by the IDEA at 20 U.S.C. § 1401(3)(a))?
  2. Is the Student Section 504-eligible or Chapter 15-eligible (meaning, is the Student a “handicapped person” as defined at 34 CFR § 104.3(j) or a “protected handicapped student” as defined at 22 Pa. Code § 15.2.1
  3. Must the District fund an independent educational evaluation (IEE) for the Student?
  4. Must the District provide a Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) and a Behavioral Support Plan (BSP), regardless of the Student’s eligibility under the IDEA or Section 504?
  5. Is the Student entitled to compensatory education to remedy any denials of either the IDEA or Section 504?
P-M-Muncy-ODRNo-14400-1314AS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.