RB vs. Bethel Park School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: R.B.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing: August 8, 2016 August 17, 2016 August 30, 2016

CLOSED HEARING

ODR Case #17916-1516AS

Parties to the Hearing: Parent[s]

Bethel Park School District 301 Church Road
Bethel Park, PA 15102

Representative:

Michelle Kline, Esquire John Valantassis, Esquire 429 Forbes Avenue
Suite 450
Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Michael Brungo, Esquire 424 South 27th Street Suite 210
Pittsburgh, PA 15203

Date of Decision: October 18, 2016

Hearing Officer: Michael J. McElligott, Esquire

INTRODUCTION

[The student] (“student”)1 is a [mid-teenaged] student residing in the Bethel Park School District (“District”). The parties agree that the student qualifies under the terms of the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)2 for specially designed instruction/related services as a student with an emotional disturbance.

Parents claim, in their complaint, that the student was denied a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) during the student’s enrollment in the District for the school years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 and seek a compensatory education remedy for that alleged denial. In the 2015-2016 school year, the student was enrolled unilaterally in a private placement, and parents seek a tuition reimbursement remedy for that enrollment in the 2015-2016 school year. Additionally, parents claim that the District has violated its obligations to the student under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Section 504”).3

The District counters that at all times it provided FAPE to the student for the period of the student’s enrollment, including the proposed programming rejected by parents prior to the unilateral enrollment of the student in a private placement. As such, the District argues that the parents are not entitled to remedy, whether compensatory education or tuition reimbursement.

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the parents in part and the District in part.

ISSUES

Did the District provide the student with FAPE for the school years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015?

If not, is the student entitled to compensatory education?

Are parents entitled to tuition reimbursement
for the unilateral private placement
for the school years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 school year?

R-B-Bethel-Park-ODRNo-17916-1516AS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.