SO vs. Reading School District



Name of Child: SO

ODR #7703/06-07 LS

Date of Birth: Xx/xx/xx

Date of Hearing: July 16, 2007


Parties to the Hearing: Mr. and Mrs.

Reading School District
800 Washington Street Reading, Pennsylvania 19601

Representative: Pro Se

Richard Guida, Esquire
1100 Berkshire Boulevard Suite 201
Reading, Pennsylvania 19610

Date Transcript Received: July 24, 2007

Date of Decision: July 27, 2007

Hearing Officer: Linda M. Valentini, Psy.D.


Student is a xx-year-old student who resides in the Reading School District (hereinafter District). Pursuant to a parentally-requested evaluation the District found Student ineligible for special education services. Mr. and Mrs. (hereinafter Parents), assert that the District’s determination was incorrect and that Student is a child who is eligible for special education. As the Parents had asked for an independent educational evaluation (IEE) at public expense, the District filed for a due process hearing to defend its position. In on and off the record discussions it was clarified by all participants that the core issue was eligibility, and that if the hearing officer found that an IEE was needed to assist in this determination one would be ordered.

It should be noted that the Parents1 were pro se in this matter. Although they had an advocate, and she was expected to be at the hearing, she did not appear. The District established on the record that the advocate was informed directly of the date, time and place of the hearing during the week prior to the hearing session. (NT 75-76)


Was the Reading School District correct in determining that Student is not eligible for special education?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.