Student vs. Council Rock School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: Student

Date of Birth:

Dates of Hearing: 7/31/2009


ODR No. 10142/08-09 KE

Parties to the Hearing:

Parent: Pro SE

School District: Council Rock School District

The Chancellor Center 30 North Chancellor Street
Newtown, PA 18940

School District Attorney:
Joanne Sommer, Esq. Eastburn and Gray
60 E. Court Street Doylestown, PA 18901

Date of Hearing: July 31, 2009 Date

Record Closed: August 6, 2009

Date of Decision: August 21, 2009

Hearing Officer: Deborah G. DeLauro


Student (Student) 1 is a second grade student in the Council Rock School District (hereinafter “District”). Student’s Parent contends that the reading program provided during the 2008-2009 school year was inappropriate and therefore Student’s Individualized Education Program (hereinafter “IEP) was inappropriate. Parent also complains that the reading program proposed in the IEP for the 2009- 2010 school year is similarly inappropriate. Parent believes that the District has provided a “reading plan” and not a reading program and the only reading program appropriate for Student is the Lindamood Bell Reading Program2. After a due process hearing session and a careful review of the parties’ testimony and evidence, I find for the District for the reasons described below.


Whether the District provided an appropriate IEP to Student for the 2008-2009 school year?
Whether the District’s IEP proposed for the 2009- 2010 school year is appropriate?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.