Student vs. Cumberland Valley School District

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: Student

Date of Birth: xx/xx/xx

Date of Hearing: May 27, 2010

CLOSED HEARING
ODR Case # 00962-09-10-AS

Parties to the Hearing:

Cumberland Valley School District 6746 Carlisle Pike Mechanicsburg, PA 17050

Representative: Pro Se

Karl Romberger, Esq. Sweet, Stevens, et. al. 331 E. Butler Avenue New Britain, PA 18901

Date Record Closed: May 27, 2010

Date of Decision: June 11, 2010

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Student (“student”) is a pre-teen aged student who has been identified as student with a disability who receives learning support in reading and supports for organization and study skills. The student resides in the Cumberland Valley School District (“District”). The parties do not dispute that the student has a disability and qualifies for services under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. The student’s parents claim that, due to a vision irregularity, the student should receive vision therapy as a related service. The District maintains that vision therapy is not necessary for the provision of a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the student under federal and Pennsylvania law.

ISSUES

Must the District provide vision therapy to the student as a related service?

Student-Cumberland-Valley-ODRNo-00962-09-10-AS-

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.