Student vs. Quakertown Community School District

Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: Student

Date of Birth: xx/xx/xx

Date of Hearing: June 2, 2010

ODR Case # 01073-09-10-KE

Parties to the Hearing:

Quakertown Community School District 600 Park Avenue
Quakertown, PA 18951


Alan Yatvin, Esq.
230 S. Broad Street Suite 503
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Anne Hendricks, Esq.
1402 Masons Mill Business Park 1800 Byberry Road
Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

Date Record Closed: June 2, 2010

Date of Decision: June 11, 2010

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student (“student”) is a teen-aged student who has been identified as a student in need of emotional support and with a specific learning disability. The student resides in the Quakertown Community School District (“District”). The parties do not dispute that the student is a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. The parties dispute centers on the student’s extended school year (“ESY”) program. The parent maintains that the District’s proposed ESY program is inappropriate due to prejudicial procedural violations and requests alternative ESY arrangements. The District maintains that the proposed ESY program it has offered is appropriate and, as such, has complied with its duties under federal and Pennsylvania law to offer the student a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”). For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the parent.


Is the District’s proposed ESY program appropriate or not?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.