Special Education Hearing Officer


Child’s Name: T.E.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

Dates of Hearing: October 31, 2012 December 7, 2012 December 18, 2012


ODR Case # 3472-1213KE

Parties to the Hearing: Parents

Cumberland Valley School District 6746 Carlisle Pike Mechanicsburg, PA 17050


Vivian Narehood, Esq. Gibbel, Kraybill & Hess 41 East Orange Street Lancaster, PA 17602

Mark Walz, Esq.
Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams 331 East Butler Avenue
P.O. Box 5069
New Britain, PA 18901

Date Record Closed: January 14, 2013

Date of Decision: January 22, 2013

Hearing Officer: Jake McElligott, Esquire


Student is a [teenaged] student residing in the Cumberland Valley School District (“District”). The parties do not dispute whether the student qualifies as a student with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act of 2004 (“IDEIA”)1. Parents claim that the District owes the parents tuition reimbursement for a unilateral private placement undertaken for the 2012-2013 school year because the District’s proposed program and placement is not designed to provide a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) to the student. The District counters that its 2012-2013 program and placement provide FAPE to the student and, as such, parents are not entitled to tuition reimbursement.

For the reasons set forth below, I find in favor of the District.


Are the parents entitled to tuition reimbursement for the unilateral private placement undertaken for the 2012-2013 school year?


Leave a Reply