XB vs. School District of Philadelphia


Due Process Hearing for XB

Date of Birth: xx/xx/xx

File Number: 7999/07-08KE

Dates of Hearings: September 7, 2007; October 26, 2007



School District of Philadelphia 440 North Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19139


Mimi Rose, Esq
Office of the General Counsel, Third Floor School District of Philadelphia
440 North Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19139

Date Transcript Received: October 31, 2007

Date of Decision: November 14, 2007

Hearing Officer: David F. Bateman, PhD


Student is a xx-year-old student eligible for special education and related services identified by the School District of Philadelphia (District) as a student with specific learning disabilities. During the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 school years he received services from the District in a learning support classroom. The Parent requested the present due process hearing seeking reimbursement for extended school year (ESY) services for her son for the summers of 2006 and 2007 that was held at the [redacted] Clinic. The Parent paid for this placement due to its reading, math, and social component provided by the interactions through basketball.

The District stated it has at all times satisfied the requirements of the IDEA and has offered an appropriate program for Student.

Though the sole issue of this hearing was extended school year services, it was not held in an expedited timeline because the summer program for which the Parent was requesting reimbursement was already completed.


Is the Parent entitled to tuition reimbursement for programming for the summers of 2006 and 2007 at the Clinic?


Leave a Reply


Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.