ZB vs. Mastery Charter School

Pennsylvania
Special Education Hearing Officer

DECISION

Child’s Name: Z.B.

Date of Birth: [redacted]

ODR No. 00858-0910 AS

CLOSED HEARING

Parties to the Hearing:

Parent[s]

Mastery Charter School 35 South 4th Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

Representative: Pro Se

Glenna M. Hazeltine, Esquire
King, Spry, Herman, Freund & Faul, LLC
One West Broad Street
Suite 700
Bethlehem, PA 18018

Date of Resolution Session April 26, 2010

Date of Hearing: May 12, 2010

Record Closed: May 18, 2010

Date of Decision: May 31, 2010

Hearing Officer: William F. Culleton, Jr., Esquire

INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Student is an early teen-aged eligible student, who is enrolled in the eighth grade at the Charter School (School). (NT 18-9 to 12.) The Student is identified with Serious Emotional Disturbance. (NT 18-25 to 19-3.) The Parent has requested an Independent Educational Evaluation. (NT 19-6 to 18.)

On or about March 11, 2010, the School filed for due process to defend the appropriateness of its evaluation report. The hearing in this matter commenced on May 12, 2010, and was completed on the same day. The record closed upon receipt of the transcript on May 18, 2010.

ISSUES

  1. Was the District’s June 4, 2009 Evaluation Report appropriate under the standards set forth in the IDEA?
  2. Should the hearing officer order the District to pay for an Independent Educational Evaluation?
Z-B-Mastery-Charter-ODRNo-00858-0910-AS

Leave a Reply

Pennsylvania

Montgomery Law, LLC
1420 Locust Street, Suite 420
Philadelphia, PA 19102
T/F. 215-650-7563

Rate By
SUPER LAWYERS
Joseph W Montgomery, II

New Jersey

Historic Smithville, Suite 1
1 N. New York Road
Galloway, NJ 08205
(all mail to Phila. office)
T. 856-282-5550

Disclaimer: Montgomery Law, LLC does not give legal advice until after it has entered into an attorney-client relationship. No part of this website creates an attorney-client relationship. All Parts of this website are Attorney Advertising. The photos and videos on this website contain portrayals of clients by non-clients, re-enactment of scenes, pictures and persons which are not actual or authentic and depictions which are a dramatization.